Notes From Battleground 2020: Endgame, Part Two
To minimize reader fatigue, the following essay will be split into two parts which I’ll
post sequentially today and tomorrow.
•A Preposterous Ticket
The many voting “irregularities” coming to light over the past several days may yet nullify Biden’s supposed victory. Some of these “irregularities” are discussed below. But first, it might serve us well to consider that the MAIN reason to be suspicious of a purported Biden/Harris victory is the extreme weakness of the Democrat ticket. Are we to believe that America enthusiastically embraced the likes of a doddering, senile septuagenarian with a history of underperformance, creepy pederast sexual fetishes often on DISPLAY on camera, and embroiled in suspect, and, possibly, criminal business dealings, paired with an extreme opportunist chameleon that holds the most leftist views in the entire Senate, over a hardworking President with four years of domestic and international success behind him (and who’s only serious flaw is a penchant for injudicious tweets), paired with an accomplished, solid and deliberate Vice President?… Not, likely. In fact, it’s preposterous.
To my reckoning the Biden/Harris ticket is the WORST one offered by ANY political party in my lifetime. I know that’s a hard hurdle to jump, but just consider the competition: McGovern/Eagleton (1972), Carter/Mondale (1976), Dukakis/Bentsen (1988), Kerry/Edwards (2004). All of the above were ABSOLUTELY TERRIBLE options for America, and, unsurprisingly, each of the above LOST. The Biden/Harris ticket, arguably tops them all, and we’re supposed to believe that they actually WON?… Please!
•Corruption
There is increasing reason to believe that the November 3rd election results have been corrupted by sustained and deliberate fraud in multiple states. The evidence for such a shocking accusation is just starting to build. Let’s take a look at the some of the recent developments.
First, start with the basics: is it POSSIBLE to tamper with election results. Biden supporters would have us believe that attempts to manipulate election results are impossible, or, at least, extremely rare. The argument goes, that because disputed elections are SO unlikely, America shouldn’t “waste its time” by looking at this matter critically. The implication is, of course, that allegations of voter fraud are “conspiracy theories,” and, as such, can and should be dismissed out of hand. That truth is, rather, that disputed elections are NOT rare. In his book, “Tainted By Suspicion” historian Fred Lucas lists at least FIVE previously disputed American Presidential elections: Adams/Jefferson (1800), Quincy Adams/Jackson (1884), Hayes/Tilden (1876), Kennedy/Nixon (1960) and Bush/Gore (2000). Bush/Gore was notable that the election was disputed for TWO reasons: ballot miscounting and, also, for concerted efforts to get members of the electoral college to vote AGAINST the outcome in their jurisdictions. Kennedy/Nixon was remarkable because Kennedy won the electoral college vote in Illinois (and, as a consequence, the nation), by only 9,500 ballots. Many observers came to believe that the ballot numbers in Chicago were falsified by Mayor Richard Daley’s political operatives. According to historian David Greenberg, “some fraud clearly occurred in Cook County. Three people WERE SENT TO JAIL, and SIX HUNDRED AND SEVENTY SEVEN others were INDICTED (before being acquitted by Judge John M. Karns, a Daley operative). (emphasis mine). And here’s the thing, again according to Lucas, “many of the allegations involved practices that wouldn’t be detected by a recount!” So, dear readers, voter fraud and counting manipulations in US presidential elections are NOT unlikely, and HAVE, in fact, occurred. Therefore, allegations of such in Trump/Biden are NOT crazy “conspiracy theories” and MUST NOT be dismissed out of hand, and MUST be investigated.
So, investigate we will! Since it’s VERY early in the process, let’s consider broad categories of pertinent evidence.
•Witnesses
As with any criminal adjudication, one of the most important classes of evidence is eye witnesses. And, somewhat surprisingly, witnesses ARE coming forward. A whistleblower in Traverse City, Michigan, has testified (and has indicated he will do so UNDER OATH) that his supervisor at USPS, Jonathan Clarke, instructed him and other workers to separate delinquent ballots so they could be hand stamped and back dated in order that they could be counted, in clear violation of Michigan law. The witness’ name has not yet been disclosed to insure his safety. The DOJ has a team in Traverse City investigating.
And, as announced by Trump Campaign representative Matt Schlapp yesterday, a second whistleblower has come forward and has agreed to testify, UNDER OATH, that, in Las Vegas, on his lunch break, he saw a Biden/Harris van pull up and unload thousands of ballots. It’s rumored that these two brave whistleblowers will be joined by others.
Then there are a number of indirect witnesses that say that ballot manipulations on the part of Democrats are COMMON. Former Democrat Governor of Illinois, Rod Blagojevich, indicated that “stealing elections” in Democrat stronghold cities is, “a time honored tradition.” (!) The New York Post has uncovered a New Jersey Democrat operative that indicated widespread voter fraud has gone on in that state for “decades.” That operative also indicated that, for the purpose of false balloting, nursing homes are “goldmines.”
•Arrests
In addition to witnesses that have stepped up voluntarily, there are witnesses that might be termed “unwilling witnesses,” i.e., those that have been ARRESTED for fraudulent activities. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton recently announced that Texas is charging Kelly Regan Brunner, a social worker at Mexia State Supported Living Center with ONE HUNDRED AND THIRTY FOUR felony counts of election fraud. Presumably, Ms. Brunner thought of nursing homes as “goldmines” too.
•Simple Statistical Anomalies
The next category of evidence involves
statistics. The simplest examples to understand involve incongruous math: there have been counties in Michigan that have logged more votes for Biden that there are registered voters. As reported by Gateway Pundit on November 4th, “Seven Milwaukee wards reported more Biden votes than registered voters. Further, the purported statewide voter participation was reported at 90%, which is considered IMPOSSIBLE. More examples of this type of “irregularity” are expected to be forthcoming as the legal process grinds on.
•Complicated Statistical Anomalies
One of the most fascinating statistical analysis applied, thus far, to election results, is an analysis of Michigan’s balloting results using Benford’s Law. Benford’s law is a mathematical rule that, although counterintuitive, has been fully proven. Put as simply as possible, the law stipulates that the frequency of integers in real world data sets is NOT evenly distributed. In data sets, one would expect that the percentage of any given integer, from 0 to 9 would be equal at 10% each. This expectation, surprisingly, is FALSE. It turns out that the numeral 1 is more common than 2 which is more common than 3 and so on. Quantitively, looking at a given data set, the numeral 1 is found about 30% of the time, the numeral 2 18%, numeral 3 about 12%, etc. Although one can design random number generators that violate Benford’s law by equalizing the frequency of integers, doing so with real word data sets is difficult or impossible. So if you tally up the frequency of numerals in a given set of data, and it DOESN’T show similar frequencies, that data set is suspicious for manipulation. I’ll include an addendum for the interested reader at the end. The law is used in forensic accounting to investigate whether a given set of numbers has been falsified. It turns out that when Michigan’s election data was subjected to this analysis, it VIOLATED BENFORD’S LAW, and, consequently is considered to have been manipulated.
•Skew Anomalies
Skew anomalies are a bit more subtle than statistical ones. They involve changes in data that are considered extremely unlikely. An good example of such an anomaly is Antrim County, Michigan. In 2016, Antrim went for Trump 63% over Hillary’s 37%. Supposedly, in 2020 it went to Biden with 62% over Trump’s 38%. As State Representative Tristan Cole said, there is “NO WAY it had flipped upside down.” Another example of skew analysis is a county changing from Trump 2016 to Biden 2020 after registrar’s records showed a net increase in Republican ballot applications of TEN THOUSAND. Much more of this type of analysis is underway.
•Then there’s examples of misreporting that have been caught. As reported by Gateway Pundit, their review of the vote tabulations revealed an instant dump of 200,000 Biden votes with ZERO to Trump at 79.8% votes counted. This occurred in Shiawassee County. Election officials there have acknowledged that this occurred and blamed it on a “typo!” Supposedly a Biden vote total of 15,371 was “mistakenly” entered as 153,710. A similar occurrence was observed in Wisconsin, as shown in the following graph.
I’ll conclude this portion of the essay here, and will post the second part tomorrow.